Fariba Alidadyani; Mahboubeh Soleimanpouromran
Abstract
The aim of this study was relationship between systemic thinking and environmental protection behavior and social responsibility. This was a descriptive study of the correlation type and the statistic society. This was a descriptive study of the correlation type and the statistic society was 98 people ...
Read More
The aim of this study was relationship between systemic thinking and environmental protection behavior and social responsibility. This was a descriptive study of the correlation type and the statistic society. This was a descriptive study of the correlation type and the statistic society was 98 people to sample. The nature and methods of descriptive and correlational study used. The study population included all employees of the Department of Environment North Khorasan 94 years, of which about 98 people to sample and census method used. Data, collected through three questionnaires systems thinking Goldman (2005) and behavior between environmental protection and Eisen (1975) and used Social Responsibility. Cronbach's alpha method was used to determine the validity of the questionnaire. Cronbach's alpha method was used to determine the credibility of the questionnaires. For system thinking, 0.94 environmental behavior was 0.96 and social responsibility was 0.96. The validity of the tool was a kind of content approved by the professors and experts.To analyze the data, descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage and mean) and inferential statistics (normal distribution of Kolmogorov - Smirnov , Pearson correlation test, regression test) and Stepwise regression test was used with SPSS version 19 software package. The results show that between systemic thinking and social responsibility, as well as the environmental behavior and social responsibility in meaningful level of 99% there is a significant relationship.
Mahsa Tavassoli; GholamReza MalekZadeh; Aireza Khorakian
Abstract
Increasing the expectations of human societies from organizations and proposing multiple views on the development of their social capital, has made communities more sensitive to some issues such as the environment, environmental health, community health and stakeholders rights. In this respect, numerous ...
Read More
Increasing the expectations of human societies from organizations and proposing multiple views on the development of their social capital, has made communities more sensitive to some issues such as the environment, environmental health, community health and stakeholders rights. In this respect, numerous issues in relationship with inappropriate environmental behaviors has been raised, which effects on people's attitudes toward work, organization and performance. Managing these types of issues as part of strategies for developing corporate social capital should be addressed.The present study investigates the effect of transformational leadership on development of employees' pro-environment behaviors and intrinsic motivation in organizations in Mashhad waste management organization by structural equation modeling. The results shows a positive and significant relationship between transformational leadership and intrinsic motivation, and between transformational leadership and environmental behaviors. Also, there was a positive and significant relationship between intrinsic motivation and peripheral behaviors of employees and the role of intrinsic motivation.
Abolfazl Khosravi
Abstract
One of the main challenges for managers in recent days is their main focus on sustainable development. Sustainable development with various dimensions such as economic sustainability, social sustainability, political stability and environmental sustainability requires a holistic approach, but the priority ...
Read More
One of the main challenges for managers in recent days is their main focus on sustainable development. Sustainable development with various dimensions such as economic sustainability, social sustainability, political stability and environmental sustainability requires a holistic approach, but the priority of some programs and policies in each of the sustainable development axes is in line with the requirements of the same region and country. On the other hand, social responsibility of organizations and companies is not merely viewed as a moral obligation or social marketing, but a great element in the missing link between government policies and corporate policies. This research has been selected to prioritize the dimensions of sustainable development as well as the dimensions of social responsibility of managers with the Delphi approach of the experts and the hierarchical analysis method, according to the opinion of social sustainability experts as the best criterion for sustainable development and management responsibility as a preferred option. Accordingly, it can be done in the role of managers in industrial and metropolitan communities, with priority being given to social sustainability and the involvement of environmental strategies in the responsibilities of managers.
