The effect of different ecosystems on the poets of Sohrab Sepehri and Manuchehr Atashi from the ecocriticism point of view

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch

Abstract

Ecology criticism or “ecocriticism” can be considered as the study of relationships between literature and environment and quality of the reflection of human’s relationship with his physical environment. In this critique, the two-way relationship between the poet and the writer with nature and the effect of natural manifestations on their soul and live will be examined.In this article, in order to answer to this question that “what effect have had the temporal environments surrounding the poems on their poets?” studies the content and main theme of Environmental poems of the poets and explain their differences and common aspects according to literature and environment. In this research, in terms of purpose, practical and in terms of collection method, descriptive-analytical is based on documentary, the following results are obtained:The similarity of the concept of ecosystem and nature-centered from the perspective of ecocriticism among the achievements of the poets, caused by morals and common human nature and the result of the similarity of some of the most influential environmental factors is like 1- the school of romance 2- the unfavorable political and social conditions of society and 3- the influence of the living environment and childhood. In poetry poets have been examined, importance of attention to nature and ecosystem, expression of environmental crisis and consciousness to protect them, led to the use of poetry as an environmental-cultural media.Native identity, utopia, city of escape, drought crisis, pollution of water and soil and air, desertification and not paying attention to the earthquake crisis and the flood and war and etc... are the important similarities of the realm of the environment-axis attitude of the studied poets, and vicinity to the nature, type of the environment and the desirability of utopia are important differences of them.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Abbasi Taleghani, N. (1998). “In Golestaneh with Sohrab Sepehri”.Tehran: Vistar. 1. [In Persian]
Atashi, M. (2017).” Poem Collection”, Vol 2. 1,Tehran: Negah Press. [In Persian]
Behruzkia, K. (2004). “World of story and environment”. Mah Kodak VA Nojavan, 85, 53-60. [In persian]
Firouzi, M. (2005).” Right to the Environment”.Tehran: Academic Jahad. 1. [In persian]
Ghaemi, P. (2006). “Who Was Called Sohrab”? Tehran: Gohare Manzor. 3. [In persian]
Glotfelt Cheryll, H. F. (1978). “Ecocriticism Reader.” Athens Georgia: University of Georgia Press.
Habibi Nassame, M. (2014).” Ecological Review with Shabirou”. Contemporary Persian Literature Magazine: Institute of Humanities and Cultural. 4(4), 95-115. [In persian]
Marchart, O. (2007).” Post-foundational political thought: political difference in nancy, Lefort, Badlou and Laclau”. Edinbrugh University Press. Chapter 4.
Modoudi, M.N. (2011). “The Interdisiplinary Movement Between the Environment and Literature Areas”. Journal of the Month Book of Science and Technology. 2(5), 12-18. [In persian]
 
Mohagheg damad, M. (2002).” Theology and the Environment”. Journal of the Academy of Sciences. 6(17), 7-30. [In persian]
Mombini, H. et al., (2012).” Content and Structural Analysis of Manouchehr's Poem”. Dissertation. Chamran University: Faculty of Literature and Humanities. [In persian]
Motahedin, Z. (1976). “Nilofar”, Journal of Mashhad Faculty of Literature and Humanities. 12(47), 1-33. [In persian]
Niyazi,N. (2015).” An eclectic expression of the short story of the pear tree”. Contemporary Persian Literature Magazine: Institute of Humanities and Cultural. 5,3, 113-127. [In persian]
Parsapur, z et al., (2014). “Sohrab sepehri Influence on Oriental Mysticism in the Field of Environmental Ethics”. Contemporary Persian Literature Magazine: Institute of Humanities and Cultural. 3,4(8), 19-37. [In persian]
Parsapur, Z. (2013). “Environmental Criticism, Literature and Environment”. Tehran: Institute of Humanities and Cultural. [In persian]
Parsapur, Z. (2012). “ A Study of the Relationship between Literature and the Environment in Poem”. University of Tehran in Faculty of Literature and Humanities: Persian Literature Magazine. 9, 66-89. [In persian]
Parsapur, Z. (2012).”Ecocriticism, New Approach to Literary Criticism”. Literary Review Quarterly, 5(19), 7-26. [In Persian]
Poyman, L. (2003). “Environmental Ethics”. Translated by Mohsen Salasi et al., 1. Tehran: Nashr Tose'e. [In Persian]
Purgharib, B. (2018). “The Feminist Criticism of Missing Soluch's Novel”. Contemporary Persian Literature Magazine: Institute of Humanities and Cultural. 8(2), 1-18. [In persian]
Rahimi rad, A. (2009).” Natruralisn in Sohrab Sepehri's Worldview”. Journal of Ferdosi. 76, 43-45. [In Persian]
Rueckert, W et al., (1995).”Literary and Ecology an Experiment in Ecoctitism”. Athens: University of Georgia press. 23-105
Sammells, R. et al. (1998) “Writing the environment: ecociticism and Literature first published”. London: Zed Book.
Sepehri, S. (2010). “Eight Books”. Tehran:Morvarid. 2. [In Persian]
Tamimi, F. (1999).” Dizashkan's Leopard”. Tehran: Saless Publications. [In Persian]
Vahabzadeh, A.H (2003).” Environmental and Etichs”. Mashhad: Jahad daneshgahi. [In Persian]
Zolfaghari, H. (2008).” Environment foundations”.Kermanshah: Razi University. 2. [In Persian]
Zolfagharkhani, M. (2016).”A review of environmental in Forough Farrokhzad`s poem on based of the Ecological Feminism”,Journal of Theory and Literary Studies, 1(2), 115-142. [In Persian]
 
 
.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Journals of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development
Volume 9, Issue 3
June 2021
Pages 147-166

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics