Agency, Development & Displacement an Introduction to Post-Colonial Ecocriticism

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.A. in English Literature, Guilan University, Iran

2 Associate Professor of English Literature Department of English Language and Literature, Guilan University

Abstract

Ecocriticism as a field of study into the state of both human and non-human entities in an act of colonization. As such three of its most important concepts, Agency, Development and Displacement, are discussed to facilitate the understanding of this approach for the readers. Non-human agency advocates against a human-centric agency and for a dynamic relationship between human and non-human agency instead. As often witnessed in the aftermath of natural disasters such as an earthquake, natural events are unpredictable and not all in control of human beings. Then it can be stated that humans are not the only active agents in the environment but that instead we need to study the dynamic relationship between human and non-human agencies. The second concept, Development, is a bridge between colonialism and non-human agency, which entails the process of changing an environment in course of monopolizing certain products in a colonized country. Such changes usually have negative effects on the natives’ lives, such as losing their jobs, homes and impoverishment. This then leads to their displacement, seeking a new area where they can find new resources to survive and build their lives around. This is then a chained set of events as explained in the article, from the promise of a development that is in truth monopolizing one or more products, to the displacement of the natives from their homes and their struggle to survive.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Becker, S. O. (2022). “Forced displacement in history: Some recent research”. Australian Economic History Review. 62(1), 2-25.
Buell, L. (2005).  The future of environmental criticism: Environmental crisis and literary imagination. 1st ed., Wiley-Blackwell,
Chakrabarty, D. (2012).” Postcolonial studies and the challenge of climate change. New Literary History”, 43(1), 1-18. doi:10.1353/nlh.2012.0007.
 Chen, J., & Hwangbo, K. (2021). “An Ecological Elegy under Colonial Violence: The Counter-Pastoral Narrative and Ecocriticism in Doris Lessing’s The Grass Is Singing”. Studies in English Language & Literature, 47(3), 99-119.
Chisty, S. (2021). Revisiting Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” through the Lens of Post-Colonial Ecocriticism. Litinfinite Journal, 3(2), 42-50.
Clark, T. (2015). Ecocriticism on the edge: The Anthropocene as a threshold concept. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Clark, T. (2019). The value of ecocriticism. Cambridge University Press.
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). “Introducing the new materialisms”. New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics, 19(1), 1-43.
Curtin, D. (2005). Environmental ethics for a postcolonial world. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Dürbeck, G., Schaumann, C., & Sullivan, H. I. (2015). Human and Non-Human Agencies in the Anthropocene.
Escobar, A. (2011). Encountering development. Princeton University Press.
Gowdy, B. (1999). The White Bone: A Novel. Macmillan.
Hanlon, W. W. (2020). “Coal smoke, city growth, and the costs of the industrial revolution”. The Economic Journal, 130(626), 462-488.
Haraway, D. J. (2013). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. Routledge.
Heise, U. K. (2016). Imagining extinction. University of Chicago Press.
Houghton, J. (2005). Global warming. Reports on progress in physics, 68(6), 1343.
  Huggan, G., & Tiffin, H. (2015). Postcolonial ecocriticism: Literature, animals, environment. Routledge.
Iovino, Serenella, and Serpil Oppermann. (2014). Material Ecocriticism. Illustrated, Indiana University Press, 2014.
Lankina, T., & Getachew, L. (2021). “Mission or empire, word or sword? The human capital legacy in postcolonial democratic development.” In Critical Readings in the History of Christian Mission (pp. 887-921). Brill.
Nash, L. (2005). “The agency of nature or the nature of agency?” Environmental History, 10(1), 67-69.
Olagunju, T. E. (2015). “Impacts of human-induced deforestation, forest degradation and fragmentation on food security”. New York Science Journal, 8(1), 10.
Parish, A. and Hall, K. (2022). “Agency”. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, J. Stanlaw (Ed.). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0008
Plumwood, V. (2002). Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge.
Rizy, K. M. (2015). Nature and displacement: an ecocritical approach to five works by Marie Darrieussecq (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).
Robinson, B. H. (2009).” E-waste: an assessment of global production and environmental impacts”. Science of the total environment, 408(2), 183-191.
Robinson, W. C. (2003). “Risks and rights: The causes, consequences, and challenges of development-induced displacement “(Vol. 18). Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
Sutton, M., & Anderson, E. (2013). Introduction to Cultural Ecology. Third, AltaMira Press.
Tripathy, Jyotirmaya 2015. Indian Environmentalism: Discourse, Politics and Fragments. Journal of Social Sciences – Sri Lanka, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. 07 (02): pp 87-104.