با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری برنامه‌‌ریزی محیط‌زیست، دانشکده محیط‌زیست، پردیس دانشکده‌های فنی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، دانشکده محیط‌زیست، پردیس دانشکده‌های فنی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 استاد، دانشکده محیط‌زیست، پردیس دانشکده‌های فنی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

4 استادیار، دانشکده محیط‌زیست، پردیس دانشکده‌های فنی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

سکونتگاه‌های شهری معاصر با توسعه، دگرگونی و پیچیدگی روزافزون موجب اختلال در نظام اکولوژیک و پیوند انسان- طبیعت، بخصوص در شهرهای کویری شده و بحران قرن بیست و یکم یا کاهش تاب‎آوری شهری را رقم زده است. بسیاری از الگوهای ارتباطی انسان -طبیعت و راه‌حل‌های الهام گرفته از محیط طبیعی حامی اصول و مفاهیم تاب‌آوری و پایداری است. به‌منظور کاربست ابعاد انسانی در برنامه‌ریزی، لازم است که عقلانیت اکولوژیک یا به عبارتی ایده‌های مبتنی بر شواهد، اصول و استراتژی‌های پیوند انسان- طبیعت تجلی‌یافته در شهرهای کهن، استخراج، انتقال و در ساختار و عملکرد اکوسیستم شهری بکار گرفته شود. ازاین‌رو، هدف مطالعه حاضر، ایجاد شهرهای تاب‌آور از طریق عقلانیت اکولوژیک و جستار حلقه پیوندی عقلانیت اکولوژیک و تاب‌آوری شهری است. این مطالعه یک بررسی توصیفی-تحلیلی و ابزار گردآوری اطلاعات روش کتابخانه‌ای است. ضمن استنتاج و تطبیق مؤلفه‌های ساختاری- عملکردی فرایند یادگیری اجتماعی و عقلانیت اکولوژیک، یادگیری اجتماعی به‌عنوان حلقه کاتالیزوری در بسط عقلانیت اکولوژیک و ارتقاء تاب‌آوری استنتاج شده است و با استفاده از مدل ساختاری-تفسیری، مؤلفه‌های استراتژیک در بسط عقلانیت اکولوژیک استخراج و درنهایت مدل مفهومی بسط عقلانیت اکولوژیک در برنامه‌ریزی شهرهای تاب‌آور از طریق حلقه پیوندی یادگیری اجتماعی ارائه شده است. نتایج مطالعه حاکی از آن است که مؤلفه‌های قابلیت درک پیچیدگی و ظرفیت انعطاف‌پذیری دو فاکتور استراتژیک در ابزار بسط عقلانیت اکولوژیک در جهت برنامه‌ریزی شهرهای تاب‌آور است و یادگیری اجتماعی به‌عنوان ابزار مدیریتی سازگارانه و مشارکتی نقش قابل‌ملاحظه‌ای در انتقال عقلانیت اکولوژیک و ارتقاء تاب‌آوری شهری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Expanding Ecological Wisdom through Social Learning in Planning of Resilient Cities

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahjabin Radaei 1
  • Esmaeil Salehi 2
  • Shahrzad Faryadi 2
  • Mohammad Reza Masnavim 3
  • Lobat Zebardast 4

1 Ph.D. student, School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Associate Professor, School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, School of Environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Contemporary urban settlements are facing increasing development, transformation, and complexity, which has disrupted the ecological system and the human-nature bond, especially in desert cities, and has led to a crisis of the 21st century or a reduction in urban resilience. Many patterns of human-nature communication and solutions inspired by the natural environment support the principles and concepts of resilience and sustainability. To apply human dimensions in planning, it is necessary to extract, transfer and use ecological wisdom, or in other words, ideas based on evidence, principles, and strategies of the human-nature bond manifested in ancient cities, in the structure and function of the urban ecosystem. Therefore, the present study aims to establish a resilient city through ecological wisdom and to investigate the link between ecological wisdom and urban resilience. This paper is a descriptive-analytic study and the data collection tool is a library-documentary method. While deduction and comparison of the structural-functional components of social learning with ecological wisdom, social learning has been inferred as a catalyst ring for ecological wisdom expansion and resilience promotion. The strategic components in ecological wisdom expansion are extracted using the structural-interpretive model. Finally the conceptual model of ecological wisdom expansion in the planning of urban resilience promotion through social learning links is presented. The results of the study indicate that the components of the ability to understand the complexity and capacity to create flexibility, are two strategic factors in the tools of expanding ecological wisdom for urban resilience planning.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Resilience
  • Ancient Cities
  • Ecological Wisdom
  • Social Learning
Achal, V., Mukherjee, A., & Zhang, Q. (2016). “Landscape and Urban Planning Unearthing ecological wisdom from natural habitats and its ramifications on development of biocement and sustainable cities”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 61–68.
Adger, W.N., Hughes, T.P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., & Rockstro¨m, J. (2005). “Social–ecological resilience to coastal disasters”. Science, 309, 1036-1039.
Alberti, M., Marzluff, J. M., Shulenberger, E., Bradley, G., Ryan, C., & Zumbrunnen, C. (2003). “Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems”. BioScience, 53(12), 1169-1179.
Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). “Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning”. Global environmental change, 18(1), 86-98.
Berkes, F. (2008). “Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Resource Management”. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Biggs, R., Rhode, C., Archibald, S., Kunene, L. M., Mutanga, S. S., Nkuna, N.,... & Phadima, L. J. (2015). “Strategies for managing complex social-ecological systems in the face of uncertainty: examples from South Africa and beyond”. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 52-67.
Brown, I., Martin-Ortega, J., Waylen, K., & Blackstock, K. (2016). “Participatory scenario planning for developing innovation in community adaptation responses: three contrasting examples from Latin America”. Reg Environ Change, 16, 1685-1700.
Campbell, T. (2012). “Beyond Smart cities: How cities network, learn, and innovate”. New York: Earthscan.
Chu, Y., Hsu, M., & Hsieh, C. (2017). “An Example of Ecological Wisdom in Historical Settlement: The Wind Environment of Huazhai Village in Taiwan”. Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(3(, 463-470.
Cid, C.R. & Pouyat, R.V. (2013). “Making ecology relevant to decision making: The human-centered, place-based approach”. Front. Ecol. Environ, 11, 447–448.
Cook, E. A., & Van Lier, H. N. (1994). “Landscape planning and ecological networks”. In Landscape planning and ecological networks: Elsevier; Developments in Landscape Management & Urban Planning, 6F.
Davies, C., & Lafortezza, R. (2017). “Urban green infrastructure in Europe: Is greenspace planning and policy compliant?”. Land use policy, 69, 93-101.
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010). “Can social interaction constitute social cognition? ”. Trends in cognitive sciences, 14(10), 441-447.
De Kraker, J., Kroeze, C., & Kirschner, P. (2011). “Computer models as social learning tools in participatory integrated assessment”. Int J Agric Sustain, 9(66), 297-309.
Diduck, A. (2010). “The learning dimension of adaptive capacity: Untangling the multilevel connections”. Pages 199-122 in D. Armitage, & R. Plummer (eds.), Adaptive capacity and environmental governance. Berlin: Springer.
Douglas, E. M., Reardon, K. M., & Täger, M. C. (2018). “Participatory action research as a means of achieving ecological wisdom within climate change resiliency planning”. Journal of Urban Management, 7(3), 152-160.
Dumont, H., Istance, D., & Benaviders, F. (2010). “The nature of learning, Center for educational Research and Innovation”. French 16.
Faris, R. (2006). “Learning Cities: Lesson Learned, in Support of Vancouver, Learning city Initiative”. http://www. members.shaw.ca (accessed October 3, 2010).
Faisal, M. N., Banwet, D. K., & Shankar, R. (2006). “Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers”. Business Process Management Journal, 12(4), 535–552.
Folke, C. (2006). “Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social– ecological systems analyses”. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253-267.
Friedmann, J., Abonyi, G. (1976). “Social learning: a model for policy research”. Environment and Planning, 8(8), 927-940.
Fu, X., Wang, X., Schock, C., & Stuckert, T. (2016). “Ecological wisdom as benchmark in planning and design”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 79–90.
Hinkel, J., Bisaro, S., Downing, T. E., Hofman, M. E., Lonsdale, K., McEvoy, D., & Tábara, J. D. (2010). “Learning to adapt: reframing climate change adaptation”. In Making Climate Change Work for Us: European Perspectives on Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies, edited by Hulme, M. and H. Neufeldt, 113-134. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Innes, J.E., Booher, D.E. (2018). “Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy”. New York: Routledge.
Jakes, P.J., & Sturtevant, V. (2013). “Trial by fire: community wildfire protection plans put to the test”. Int J Wildland Fire, 22(52), 1134-1143.
Jiggins, J., van Slobbe, E., & Ro¨ ling, N. (2007). “The organisation of social learning in response to perceptions of crisis in the water sector of The Netherlands”. Environ Sci Policy, 10, 526-536.
Johansson, K.E., Axelsson, R., & Kimanzu, N. (2013). “Mapping the relationship of inter-village variation in agroforestry tree survival with social and ecological characteristics: the case of the Vi agroforestry project, Mara Region, Tanzania”. Sustainability, 5, 5171-5194.
Khoo, T. C. (2012). “The CLC framework: for liveable and sustainable cities, Urban Solutions”. Centre for Liveable Cities, Singapore, 58-63.
Kusmarni, Y., & Holilah, M. (2017). “The Ecological Wisdom Values of Agricultural Land Utilization by the Indigenous People of Cigugur Kuningan, West Java”. 1st UPI International Geography Seminar 2017, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 145.
Lam, M.E. (2014). “Building ecoliteracy with traditional ecological knowledge: Do, listen, and learn”. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 250–251.
Langen, T.A., Mourad, T., Grant, B.W., Gram, W.K., Abraham, B.J., Fernandez, D.S., Carroll, M., Nuding, A., Balch, J.K., & Rodriguez, J. (2014). “Using large public datasets in the undergraduate ecology classroom”. Front. Ecol. Environ, 12, 362–363.
Leeuwis, C., Pyburn, R., & Röling, N. (2002). “Wheelbarrows full of frogs: social learning in rural resource management: international research and reflections”. Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
Li, X., & Liao, J. (2014). “Analysis on the ecological wisdom of historical village in the Yellow River basin:as an Example of Guang Village”. Advanced Materials Research, 869-870, 1133-1137.
Li, J., & Liu, N. (2013). “Ecological Wisdom and Renewal of Jiarong Tibetan Residence in Zhonglu West Sichuan Province”. Advanced Materials Research, 450-451, 1493-1497.
Li, M., Zhang, Y., Xu, M., He, L., Liu, L., & Tang, Q. (2020). “China Eco-Wisdom: A Review of Sustainability of Agricultural Heritage Systems on Aquatic-Ecological Conservation”. Sustainability, 12(1), 60.
Liao, K.,Tuan, L., & Nguyen, K. (2016). “Urban design principles for flood resilience: Learning from the ecological wisdom of living with floods in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 69–78.
Maes, J., & Jacobs, S. (2017). “Nature‐based solutions for Europe's sustainable development”. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 121-124.
May, T., & Perry, B. (2018). “Cities and the knowledge economy: Promise, politics and possibilities”. London: Routledge Earthscan.
Oldenhuizing, J., de Kraker, J., & Valkering, P. (2013). “Design of a quality-of-life monitor to promote learning in a multi-actor network for sustainable urban development”. Clean Production, 49, 74-84.
Pahl-Wostl, C., Becker, G., Knieper, C., & Sendzimir, J. (2013). “How multilevel societal learning processes facilitate transformative change: a comparative case study analysis on flood management”. Ecological Society, 18, 58.
Patten, D. T. (2016). “The role of ecological wisdom in managing for sustainable interdependent urban and natural ecosystems”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 3–10.
Perrin, A., & Rolland, N. (2007). “Mechanisms of intra-organisational knowledge transfer: the case of a global technology firm”. M@ n@ gement, 10(2), 25-47.
Pilgrim, S., Smith, D., & Pretty, J. (2007). “A cross-regional assessment of the factors affecting ecoliteracy: Implications for policy and practice”. Ecological Application, 17, 1742–1751.
Potschin M., Kretsch C., Haines-Young R., Furman E., Berry P. & Baró F. (2016). “Nature- based solutions”, In: Potschin M., Jax K., (Eds.), OpenNESS Ecosystem Services Reference Book, 2016, EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428.
Radaei, M., Salehi, E., Faryadi, S., Masnavi, M.R., & Zebardast, L. (2020). “Ecological wisdom, a social–ecological approach to environmental planning with an emphasis on water resources: the case of Qanat Hydraulic Structure (QHS) in a desert city of Iran”. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01067-4
Ramsden, P. (2003). “Learning to teach in higher education”. New York: Routledge.
Reynolds, J.A., & Lowman, M.D. (2013). “Promoting ecoliteracy through research service-learning and citizen science”. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environments, 11, 565–566.
Rutledge, K. (2001). “Social learning theory”. Available URL: http://teachnet.edb.Utexas.edu /~lynda_abbot/ social.htm [Accessed 1/2/2001].
Rydin, Y. (2010). “Actor-network theory and planning theory: A response to Boelens”. Planning theory, 9(3), 265-268.
Schultz L, Folke C, O¨sterblom H, Olsson, P. (2015). “Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112, 7369-7374.
Schwann, A. (2018). “Ecological wisdom: Reclaiming the cultural landscape of the Okanagan Valley”. Journal of Urban Management, 7(3), 172-180.
Stevenson, R.D., Klemow, K.M., & Gross, L.J. (2014). “Harnessing bits and bytes to transform ecology education”. Front. Ecol. Environ., 12, 306–307.
Stringer, L. C., Reed, M. S., Fleskens, L., Thomas, R. J., Le, Q. B., & Lala‐Pritchard, T. (2017). “A new dryland development paradigm grounded in empirical analysis of dryland systems science”. Land Degradation & Development, 28(7), 1952-1961.
Walker, B., Gunderson, L., Kinzig, A., Folke, C., Carpenter, S., & Schultz, L. (2006). “A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems”. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 13-29.
Vallenga, D., Grypdonck, M., Hoogwerf, L., & Tan, F. (2009). “Action research: What, why and how?”. Acta Neurologica Belgica, 109, 81–90.
Vlaev, I., & Dolan, P. (2015). “Action change theory: A reinforcement learning perspective on behavior change”. Review of General Psychology, 19(1), 69-95.
Wang, X., Palazzo, D., & Carper, M. (2016). “Ecological wisdom as an emerging field of scholarly inquiry in urban planning and design”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 100–107.
Whyte, W. F., Greenwood, D. J., & Lazes, P. (1991). “Participatory action research: through practice to science in social research”. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.). Participatory action research (pp. 19–55). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Wilkinson, C. (2012). “Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory”. Plan. Theory., 11, 148–169.
Xiang, W. N. (2014). “Doing real and permanent good in landscape and urban planning: Ecological wisdom for urban sustainability”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 212, 65–69.
Xiang, W. (2016). “Ecophronesis: The ecological practical wisdom for and from ecological practice”. Landscape and Urban Planning, 155, 53–60.
Young, R. (2009). “Discursive practice in language learning and teaching”. Malden, MA: WileyBlackwell.
Zhang, L., Yang, Z., Voinov, A., & Gao, S. (2019). “Nature-Inspired Stormwater Management Practice: The Ecological Wisdom Underlying the Tuanchen Drainage System in Beijing, China, and Its Contemporary Relevance”. in Ecological Wisdom. Singapore: Springer.
Zheng, S., Han, B., Wang, D., & Ouyang, Z. (2018). “Ecological Wisdom and Inspiration Underlying the Planning and Construction of Ancient Human Settlements: Case Study of Hongcun UNESCO World Heritage Site in China”. Sustainability, 10(5), 1–19.