تأثیر برنامه آموزش سواد محیط‌زیستی مبتنی بر فناوری واقعیت افزوده بر دانش، نگرش و رفتار محیط‌زیستی دانش آموزان دوره متوسطه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

2 کارشناس ارشد کارشناسی ارشد تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

3 استادیار گروه تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

10.30473/ee.2021.7534

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر، با هدف بررسی تأثیر برنامه آموزش سواد محیط‌زیستی مبتنی بر فناوری واقعیت افزوده بر دانش، نگرش و رفتار محیط‌زیستی دانش آموزان دوره متوسطه انجام شده است. جامعۀ آماری این پژوهش را کلیۀ دانش‌آموزان دورۀ متوسطه شهر تهران که در سال تحصیلی 1396-1397 مشغول به تحصیل بوده‌اند، تشکیل می‌دهند. نمونۀ موردمطالعه با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری غیر تصادفی انتخاب شد که به دو گروه 20 نفری (گروه آزمایش و کنترل) تقسیم شدند. روش تحقیق، روش شبه آزمایشی (طرح پیش‌آزمون- پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل) بود. ابتدا آزمون سواد محیط‌زیستی به‌عنوان پیش‌آزمون استفاده شده است. سپس ابزارهای ارتباطی سیار جهت اجرای واقعیت افزوده در اختیار گروه آزمایش قرارگرفته و در گروه کنترل مطالب محیط‌زیستی موردنظر به‌صورت سنتی ارائه شد. پس از اتمام تدریس در هر دو گروه، مجدداً ابزار پرسشنامه سواد محیط‌زیستی مورداستفاده قرار گرفت و نتایج آن مورد مقایسه قرار گرفت. جهت تحلیل داده‌ها از آزمون تحلیل کوواریانس و آزمون واریانس چند متغیره استفاده‌شده است. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که برنامه آموزش سواد محیط‌زیستی مبتنی بر فناوری واقعیت افزوده بر دانش، نگرش و رفتار محیط‌زیستی دانش آموزان دوره متوسطه تأثیر مثبتی داشته است و می‌تواند به‌عنوان ابزاری مفید در آموزش مورداستفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of Augmented Reality-based Environmental Literacy Education Program on the Environmental Knowledge, Attitude and Behavior of Highschool Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Khadijeh Aliabadi 1
  • Fatemeh Joneidi Jafari 2
  • Saeid Pourroostaei Ardakani 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaee University, Tehran, Iran
2 Ms.C Graduated Educational Technology, Allameh Tabatabaee University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaee University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of augmented reality technology based environmental literacy training program on the knowledge, attitude and behavior of high school students. The population of this study consisted of all high school students of Tehran who were studying in the year 1396-97. The sample was selected by non-random sampling method and divided into two groups of 20 (experimental and control groups). The research method was quasi-experimental (pretest-posttest with control group). First, the environmental literacy test was used as a pre-test. Then the mobile tools were provided to the experimental group to perform augmented reality, and control group were presented in the traditional environment. After completing the teaching process in both groups, the environmental literacy questionnaire was used again, and its results were compared. Covariance analysis and multivariate analysis of variance were used for data analysis. The results showed that environmental literacy education based on augmented reality technology had a positive effect on the knowledge, attitude and environmental behavior of high school students and it can be used as a useful tool in education.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Environmental literacy
  • Augmented Reality
  • environmental knowledge
  • Attitude
  • Behavior
Amirteimouri,M. (2008). Teaching-learning media. Tehran: Savalan. [In Persian]
Amy, K, Shari,M., Tina,G., Craig,B. & Chris,D. (2016). “Atom Tracker: designing a mobile augmented reality experience to support instruction about cycles and conservation of matter in outdoor learning environments”, Assiciation for Educational Communications & Technology, Indiana University Bloomington, 7(2),111-113.
Amy,K. (2013). “EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips”. Computers & Education, 68, 545–556.
Asghari,L.S. (1997). The Basics of Environmental Protection in Islam, Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University. [In Persian]
Azuma, R. T. (1997). “A Survey of Augmented Reality”. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments,6(4), 355-385.
Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S. & MacIntyre, B. (2001). “Recent advances in augmented reality”. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34–47. doi:10.1109/38.963459.
Chiang, T. H. (2014). “An Augmented Reality-based Mobile Learning System to Improve Students’ Learning Achievements and Motivations in Natural Science Inquiry Activities”. Educational Technology & Society, 17, 353.
Cox, M.,Webb, M., Abbott, C., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T. & Rhodes, V. (2003).”ICT and peda-gogy”.ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series, (18). Coventry, England: BECTA.
Ebrahimi,Gh. & Moghanaki,S. & Abedin,A. (2008). Methods of teaching environmental skills to children. Effective Schools, 4, 87-89. [In Persian]
Environmental Performance Indicator (EPI). (2016). the Report of Environmental Performance Index. Yale University.
Ghaffari,H. & Younesi,A. & Rafiee,M. (2015). Analyzing the Role of Investment in Education to Achieve Sustainable Development; with special emphasis on environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 79-100. [In Persian]
Ghavamabadi, M. (2012). Strategic Review of Environmental Education in Iran: Necessities and Difficulties. Strategy, 65, 233-257. [In Persian]
Gulsun, K. & Hakan, A. (2017). Mobile Technologies and Augmented Reality in Open Education. Hershey, Pennsylvania
Gutierrez, J. M. (2014). “Augmented Reality Environments in Learning, Communicational and Professional Contexts in Higher Education”. Digital Education Review, 26(24),61-73.
Hollweg, K. S. (2011). Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. Washington: North Ameriaca Association for Environmental Education.
Hungerford, H. & Volk, T. L. (1991). “Curriculum development in EE for the primary-school: challenges and responsibilities”. In Paper for the International Training Seminar on Curriculum development in EE for the primary school (pp. 27-31).
Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S. & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(1), 1-19.
Koutromanos, G. & Tzortzoglou, F. & Sofos, A. (2018). Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Game for Environmental Education: “Save Elli, Save the Environment”. Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education,231-241.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: University of Cambridge Press.
Lee, K. (2012). Augmented Reality in Education and Training. University of Northern Colorado & KOSHA, 403-410.
Masoomifard, M. (2019). Study of the Relationship of the various Interaction Types in E-learning with Collaborative Learning Quality (Case Study of Master's Students in Environmental Education). Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 7(3), 103-114. doi: 10.30473/ee.2019.5811.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). “Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction”. The American Psychologist, 63(8), 760–769.
Morneo, R. (2006). “Does the modality principle hold for different media?A Test of the method‐affects‐ learning hypothesis”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 149–158.
Nielson, D. L. (2012). “Effect of active learning theory on the motivation of school blindness and low vision in Texas”. LID Academy - 2012 Texas Active Learning Conference, TX, June (19-20). Retrieved from http://www.tsbvi.edu/.
Piaget, J. (1973).To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Grossman.
Santos, M. E. C., Chen, A., Taketomi, T., Yamamoto, G., Miyazaki, J. & Kato, H. (2014). “Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation”. Learning Technologies. IEEE Transactions on, 7(1), 38–56.
Shobeiri,M., Ghaemi,A. & Ghaemi,P. (2013). “Investigation of the process of environmental education in the five-year development plans of the country and presenting appropriate solutions for implementation of environmental education”. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 1, 29. [In Persian]
Sommerauer, P. & Müller, O. (2014). “Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition”. Computers & Education, 79, 59–68.
Stapp, W. B., Albright, J., Cox, D., Cyrus, D., Greager, J., Hudspeth, T. & Puntenney, P. (1979). “Toward a national strategy for environmental education”. Current Issues in Environmental Education and Environmental Studies V, Columbus, OH: ERIC/SMEAC ED, 180(822), 4-20.
Stevevson, R. (2013). an Orientation to Environmental Education and the Handbook. New Yourk: Routledge
Theodorou, P., Kydonakis, P., Botzori, M. & Skanavis, C. (2018). “Augmented reality proves to be a breakthrough in Environmental Education”. Protection and restoration of the environment XIV, 219-228.
UNESCO. (1987). UNESCO-UNEP International Congress on Environmental Education and Training. Moscow
Vafeghi,E. & Haghighian,M. (2015). “The role of cultural capital in environmental social behaviors”. Parliament and Strategy, No. 84, pp. 371-393. [In Persian]
.