The Moderating Role of Managers’ Emotional Intelligence in Explaining the Relationship between Research and Development Costs and Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Accounting, Department of Accounting, Broujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Broujerd, Iran

2 \Assistant Profesor, Department of Accounting, Broujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Broujerd, Iran

3 Associate Profesor, Department of Accounting, Broujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Broujerd, Iran

چکیده

Corporate social responsibility approaches are becoming increasingly widespread since environmental performance is a significant aspect of developing a firm socioemotional wealth, such as legitimacy, trustworthiness, and image. This study investigates the moderating role of managers’ emotional intelligence on the relationship between research and development costs and the social and environmental responsibility of manufacturing companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange. This research is applied and correlational. One hundred thirty-two companies were selected as sample companies that were active in the Tehran Stock Exchange during 2010-2020. The data is collected from the actual financial statements of the companies through the Kodal website, and it is compiled using Excel software. The method of testing the hypotheses is moderator regression (hierarchical), and Eviuse 12 software is used to test the hypotheses. The findings reveal that research and development costs have a meaningful relationship with the social and environmental responsibility of manufacturing companies, and the emotional intelligence of managers has a moderating role in the relationship between research and development costs and the social and environmental responsibility of manufacturing companies. The results can help all stakeholders evaluate the level of attention of companies to research and development costs and corporate social and environmental responsibility.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Moderating Role of Managers’ Emotional Intelligence in Explaining the Relationship between Research and Development Costs and Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sobhan Abdolrezaei 1
  • Mohammd Hassan Janani 2
  • Mahmoud Hematfar 3
1 Ph.D. Candidate in Accounting, Department of Accounting, Broujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Broujerd, Iran
2 Assistant Profesor, Department of Accounting, Broujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Broujerd, Iran
3 Associate Profesor, Department of Accounting, Broujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Broujerd, Iran
چکیده [English]

Corporate social responsibility approaches are becoming increasingly widespread since environmental performance is a significant aspect of developing a firm socioemotional wealth, such as legitimacy, trustworthiness, and image. This study investigates the moderating role of managers’ emotional intelligence on the relationship between research and development costs and the social and environmental responsibility of manufacturing companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange. This research is applied and correlational. One hundred thirty-two companies were selected as sample companies that were active in the Tehran Stock Exchange during 2010-2020. The data is collected from the actual financial statements of the companies through the Kodal website, and it is compiled using Excel software. The method of testing the hypotheses is moderator regression (hierarchical), and Eviuse 12 software is used to test the hypotheses. The findings reveal that research and development costs have a meaningful relationship with the social and environmental responsibility of manufacturing companies, and the emotional intelligence of managers has a moderating role in the relationship between research and development costs and the social and environmental responsibility of manufacturing companies. The results can help all stakeholders evaluate the level of attention of companies to research and development costs and corporate social and environmental responsibility.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Emotional Intelligence
  • Research and Development Costs
  • Corporate Social and Environmental Responsibility

مراجع

Alam S.M.S., Islam K.M.Z. (2021). Examining the role of environmental corporate social responsibility in building green corporate image and green competitive advantage. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 6(8), 1-16.
Banerjee, R., Hitoshi M. (2018).The impact of liquidity regulation on banks. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 35, 30-40.
Bar-on, R., Orme, G. (2002). The contribution of emotional intelligence to individual and organizational effectiveness. Competency and Emotional Intelligence, 9(4), 23-28
Barsade, S.G., Brief, A.P., Spataro, S. (2003). The affective revolution in organizational behavior: The emergence of a paradigm.In J. Greenberg (Ed), Ob: The state of science. Hillsdale, NJ: L, Erlbaum Associates.
Carley, K.M. (1997). Organizations and Constraint-based adaptation.In R.A EVE.S. Horsfall, & M.E.Lee (Eds), Chaos, Complexity and Sociology: Myths, models and theories, 229-242.
Cho, K., Cho, S., Lee, J. (2019). Managerial attributes, consumer proximity, and corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26, 159–169.
Espindola, I.B., Ribeiro, W.C. (2020). Cidades e mudancas climaticas: desafios para os planos diretores municipais brasileiros. Cadernos Metropole; 22: 365-396.
Ezzi, F., Jarboui, A., Zouari-Hadiji, R. (2020). Exploring the relationship between managerial emotional intelligence, R&D and CSR performance: A mediated moderation analysis, The Journal of High Technology management research, 31, 1-15.
Fan, S., Wang C. (2019). Firm age, ultimate ownership, and R&D investments, International Review of Economics and Finance, 76, 1245-1264.
Firori, M., Antonakis, J. (2011). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Searching for valid measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 329-334.
Ford, J.A., Steen, J., Verreynne, M. (2014). How environmental regulations affect innovation in the Australian oil and gas industry: going beyond the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 84, 204-213.
Gray, R. (2002).The Social Accounting Project and Accounting Organizations and Society, Accounting is Applied in the Financial Statements of Companies in Gaza Strip. Journal of Islamic University, (Human Studies Series), 15(1), 239-281.
Grejo, L.M., Lunkes, RJ. (2022). A Maturidadade em Sustentabilidade Contribui para Objetivos Sustentaveis? Um olhar sobre a eficiencia de recursos. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 16(3), 30-39.
Hart, S.L. (1994). A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. The Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014.
Huang, J., Zhao, J., Cao, J. (2021). Environmental regulation and corporate R&D investment-evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. International Review of Economics and Finance, 72, 154-174.
Jafari Taraji, G. (2015). Investing the Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility and Environmental Disclosures in the Companies Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange, Master Degree in Accounting, Yazd University.
Kilic, M., Uyar, A. (2014). The Impact of Corporate Characteristics on Social Responsibility and Environmental Disclosures in Turkish Listed Companies. Corporate Governance, 4, 253-276.
Kolk, A., Pinkse, J. (2010).The Integration of Corporate Governance in Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 17(1), 15-26.
Konno, Y., Itoh Y. (2018). Empirical analysis of R&D in the Japanese construction industry based on the structure conduct performance model. Cogent Business & Management, 5, 1-15.
Kurniawati, L., Kholis, N., Mujiyati. (2022). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Implementation of Social and Environmental Responsibility Disclosure in Property, Real Estate, and Construction Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2015-2020. Journal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 7(2), 251-261.
Mayer, J.D., Caruso, D., Salovey, P. (2000). Models of emotional intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg(Ed), Handbook of intelligence, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Park, S., Nicolau, J.L. (2019). Image effect on customer-centric measures of performance. Annals of Tourism Research, 76, 226-238.
Rahimi Rad, S., Heydari, H., Najarzadeh, R. (2017). Investigating the factors affecting the intensity of research and development costs in Iran’s industrial workshops, Journal of Economics Research, 18(71), 53-90.
Rode, J.C., Mooney, C., Arthaud-Day, H., Near, M. (2007). Emotional intelligence and individual performance: Evidence of direct and moderated effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28, 399-421.
Sepasi, S., Esmaili Kejani, M. (2013).  A Theoretical Model of Corporate Governance and Environmental Disclosure Based on Cost Management Approach, Accounting Knowledge Management Auditing, 3(9), 147-160.
Yang, C., Tseng, Y., Chen, C. (2012). Environmental regulations, induced R &d, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(4), 514-532.
Yew, K., Mira, T., Chee M. (2006). Size, leverage, concentration, and R&D investment in generating growth opportunities. The Journal of Business, 79(2), 851-876.
فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار
دوره 11، شماره 4
1402
صفحه 147-157

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار