ارزیابی روش‌های آموزش محیط ‌زیست بر اساس مدل AHP

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه پیام نور

2 گروه آموزش محیط زیست، دانشگاه پیام نور

3 گروه پژوهشی ایمنی هسته ای و حفاظت پرتوی، پژوهشگاه علوم و فنون هسته ای

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر،ارزیابی شیوه‌های آموزشی به‌ منظور انتخاب شیوه ­های مناسب آموزشی در جهت ارتقاء آگاهی‌های محیط ‌­‌زیستی و نهایتاً تغییر رفتار فردی در حفظ محیط ­زیست می­باشد. روش تحقیق، پژوهشی از نوع پیمایشی و جامعه آماری شامل 260 نفر از مدیران و کارشناسان دولتی شهر تهران بوده ‌است. ابزار نظرسنجی، پرسشنامه­­ با طرح یک سؤال در مقیاس چند گزینه­ای-تک جوابی بوده که جهت سنجش میزان علاقه کارکنان در خصوص انواع روش‌های معمول آموزشی در ادارات صورت ‌‌پذیرفته ‌‌است. نتایج حاصل از نظرسنجی در فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (AHP) با در نظر گرفتن کلیه معیارهای تأثیرگذار در فرایند تصمیم‌گیری مورد ارزیابی قرارگرفت. در این مدل با روش دلفی و کسب نظر از افراد متخصص دانشگاهی در حوزه علوم تربیتی، پارامترهای زمان، هزینه، افزایش سطح دانش، تعداد فراگیران، تغییر رفتار و وجود تعامل بین فراگیران به­ عنوان معیارهای اصلی انتخاب و رتبه ­بندی صورت‌‌ پذیرفته ‌‌است. نتایج تحقیق نشان‌ می­ دهد که کارگاه­ آموزشی دارای بالاترین امتیاز با وزن 515/0 بوده و گزینه­ های آموزش از راه دور با وزن 263/0 و سخنرانی با وزن 222/0 در  اولویت‌­های بعدی قرار گرفته‌اند. همچنین در این تحقیق با تغییر در ارجحیت هر یک از معیارها، اولویت روش­ های آموزشی نیز به صورت کمّی قابل محاسبه می­باشد. به­ طوری­که با هدف افزایش تعداد فراگیران (تغییر درصد وزنی معیار فراگیران از 6/7 به 8/37) آموزش از راه دور نسبت به سایر گزینه­ ها دارای اولویت بالاتری می­باشد. به همین ترتیب با هدف افزایش سطح دانش (تغییر درصد وزنی معیار دانش از 9/16 به 3/60)، سخنرانی دارای اولویت بالاتری خواهد گردید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Environmental Education Methods based on AHP Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • P. Ghaemi 1
  • S.M .Shobeiri 2
  • M. Larijani 2
  • B. Rokrok 3
1 Payame Noor University
2 Department of Environmental Education, Payame Noor University
3 Nuclear Safety and Radiation Protection Group, Nuclear Science and Technology Institute
چکیده [English]

The objective of the current study is to evaluate training methods in order to select the appropriate methods to promote environmental awareness and finally to change individual behavior to protect the environment. The methodology of this study is a survey of a statistical group involving 260 public sector managers and experts in Tehran. The tool for survey consisted of a questionnaire with one question in Multi-Choice, Single-Response Scale to measure the interest of employees in training methods in offices. The results of survey in the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) were evaluated, taking into account all the factors. In this model, after consultation with scholars in the field of educational science with Delphi method, the parameters of time, cost, increasing the level of knowledge, the number of trainees, change of behavior and interaction among trainees were selected as the main criteria in AHP and the grading was carried out. The results of the study showed that workshop had the highest score with a weight of 0.515, and the options of distance education with a weight of 0.263 and lecture with a weight of 0.222 being the next priorities. Also in this study, the change in preference for any of the criteria, priority of training methods can be calculated with quantifying. As with the aim of increasing the number of trainees (from 7.6% to 37.8%), distance-education has higher priority than other options, and so with the aim of increasing the level of knowledge (from 16.9% to 60.3%), lecture will have higher priority.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Evaluation
  • Training Method
  • AHP
  • Environmental Education

اصل مقاله

.

مراجع

Ajza Shokouhi, M. and Moradi, F. (2012). “Comparative Study on the stability of communities of Sarab and Sajjad of Mashhad using methods AHP and Delphi.” Journal of geography and regional development. (19). PP. 95-117.
Akomolafe, O. (2011). “Impact of personal factors on environmental education in Tertiary Institutions in Ekiti State, Nigeria.” Inter-national Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education. 1(1). PP. 559-564.
Albayrak, E., and Erensal, Y. C. (2004). “Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance. An application of multiple criteria decision making problem.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. 15.PP. 491–503.
Boling, E. C., Hough, M., Krinsky, H., Saleem, H., and Stevens, M. (2012). “Cutting the distance in distance education: Perspectives on what promotes positive, online learning experiences.” The Internet and Higher Education. 15(2). PP. 118-126.
Boroushaki, S., and Malczewski, J. (2008). “Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS.” Computers and Geosciences. (34). PP. 399-410.
CEPA-Canada (Canadian Environmental Protect-ion Act). (2012). “Environmental education, Education for sustainable development working group.”
Dagdeviren, M., and Yüksel, I. (2008). “Develop-ing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management.” Information Science. 178. PP. 1717–1733.
Dianati Deilami, Z., Behzadpour, S., Alami, M. R., and Hajimaghsodi, M. (2011). “Multi-Criteria decision- making technique (AHP and TOSIS) in anticipation of the future statues of companies in the Tehran Stock Exchange,” Journal of Financial Engineering and Portfolio Management. (3). PP.181-203.
Elshinta S.M. (2012). “Environmental education for sustainable development from Jakarta to the Heart of Borneo.” WWF-Indonesia.
Ghodsi-pour, S. H. (2007). “Analytical hierarchy process (AHP).” Tehran: Amirkabir University of Tech. Publiction. 5th Ed.
Golafrouz Shahri, H. and Khaghanizadeh, M. (2009). “Introduction to oral presentation teaching method.” Scientific Journal of Education Strategies. 2 (4). PP.161-166.
Hamidian, A. (2011). “The Importance of attention to environmental culture of students (Case study: University of Tehran).” First Conference of National Botanical Garden of Iran.
Hosseini M., Porahmadzadeh S., Sanjari S., Maskon Jacob H. and Mohammadi Soleimani M.R. (2014). “Identify and ranking the factors affecting on e-banking customers’ satisfaction in saman bank.” Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. 4 (S1). PP. 1819-1822.
Hosseinali, F., and Alesheikh, A.A. (2008). “Weighting spatial information in GIS for copper mining exploration.” American Journal of Applied Sciences. (5), PP. 1187-1198.
Jokar, G., and Mirdamadi, S.M. (2010). “The perception of female high school students in Shiraz about protecting environment.” Journal of Agricultural Extension and Education Research. 1(3). PP. 1-13
Karimi, A., Mehrdadi, N., Hashemian, S.J., Nabibidhendi, Gh. and Tavakolimoghadam, R. (2010). “Using AHP for selecting the best wastewater treatment process.” Journal of Water and Wastewater. 21 (2). PP. 2-12.
Khorshiddoost, A. (2011). “Environmental Education in the 21st Century. Tehran: SAMT Publication, Second Edition.
Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Pariazar M., and Zaeri, M. S. (2007). “Project selection by using fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS technique.” International Journal of Human and Social Sciences. (30). PP. 333-338.
Mohammadi Soleimani, M.R., Delavar, A., Dortaj, F., Saleh Sedgh Rouz, B. and Sanjari, Sh. (2014). “A model for selecting managers in industrial sector in organization of industry, mine and trade by using the fuzzy AHP method.” Journal of Training Measurement.  5 (18). PP. 21-44.
Monshizadeh, S., Mohammadi Soleimani, M.R., Sanjari, Sh., Hatami Maskon, J. and Sivandipour, H. (2015). “Ranking math teachers in Kerman province by using AHP technique.” International Journal of Management and Humanity Sciences. 4 (1). PP. 4430-4433. Available at:
http://www. aensionline.com/aeb_March_ 2011. Html.
Nasresfahani, A., and Khanazizi, M. (2000), “Analysis of the short-term in-service training of secondary school administrators in Bushehr province.” Journal of Education. (25). PP.79-80.
Nur, I. N., Noraini, H. and Zanariah, M.Y. (2015). “Selecting best employee of the year using analytical hierarchy process.”  Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research. 5(11). PP. 72-76, Available at: www.textroad. Com.
Palmer, J. A. (2011). “Environmental Education in the 21st Century”. Translated by A. M. Khorshiddoost. Tehran: SAMT Publication. Second Edition.
Saaty, T.L. (2000). “Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory. 2nd Ed., PA: RWS Publication. Pittsburgh.
Safavi, A. (1995). “Teaching of models and technique method. 5th Ed. Tehran: Maaser Publiction.
Samiee, M., Salehi, E. and Masnavi, M. (2013). “A variety of teaching methods to determine the effectiveness of aid and adolescents in the field of culture”. Journal of Educational Innovation. 12 (47). PP.67-81.
Schwartz, M. (2016). “Running a Successful Workshop.” Learning & Teaching Office. Available at: http://www.ryerson.ca/lt/.
Sepahvand, R. (2013). “QFD and AHP approaches in the selection of suppliers with a case study at zamzam.” Journal of Operational Research in its Applications. 11 (1). PP. 19-30.
Siahaan T. S. (2013). “Environmental education: A mismatch between theory and practice, Indonesia to Boost Geothermal Focus.” Central of Environmental Education.
Smidt, E., Bunk, J., McGrory, B., Li, R. and Gatenby, T. (2014). “Student attitudes about Distance Education: Focusing on context and effective practices.” The IAFOR Journal of Education. 1 (2).PP. 40-64
Soleiman Nezhad, A. and Zavari Rezaei, A. (2015). “Application of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in productivity of costs of Quality.” Technical Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 5 (S). PP. 184-189, Available at: http://www.tjeas.com/.
Weiner, B. (2011). “A Cognitive- Emotion- Action model of motivated Behavior: An Analysis of Judgments of help giving.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 39. PP.186-200.
Zandi, B. and Haghighi, F. (2012). “Strategies for continuous training human resources emphasizing on distance teaching workshops.” Thehran: Payame Noor University Publication. Second Edition.
Zebardast, E. (2001). “The application of analytic hierarchy process in urban and regional planning.” Journal of Fine Arts. 10. PP. 13-21.
 

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار