Effectiveness of social and governance strategies on improving urban resilience against earthquake

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 School of environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran

2 School of Architecture and Urban Development, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

چکیده

The study of the resilience of the cities against earthquake is one of the necessities for the reduction of losses and death toll of the earthquakes. Resilience has various definitions and there is not a unique comprehensive model for its quantitative assessment. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive quantitative indicator for resilience and to study the efficacy of social and governance strategies in improvement of urban resilience against earthquake. To achieve this aim, first effective dimensions and indices of resilience of urban areas were explored and extracted by reviewing available research studies and experts elicitation method. Then based on experts’ opinions and pairwise comparison the model was justified and the relative weights for dimensions and indices were obtained and a comprehensive overall resilience index was introduced. Using the proposed index, the efficacy of different social and governance strategies were compared considering three different earthquake scenarios of North-Tehran, Ray fault, and floating faults. The comparisons were based on three metrics i.e. absolute value of resilience increase, distance from the origin of the Pareto chart considering implementation duration time and costs, and the ratio of cost to resilience increase. In this regard, strategy S3 (90 percent increase of social resilience), strategy S1 (10 percent increase of social resilience) and strategy S3 were the optimal ones based on the first, second and third metrics, respectively. On the whole, the social strategies had better efficiency than the governance ones, but it seems in practice the social and governance strategy categories must be implemented in an integrated manner which could be considered as a future research proposal.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effectiveness of social and governance strategies on improving urban resilience against earthquake

نویسندگان [English]

  • Babak Omidvar 1
  • Reza Ghasemi 2
  • Mostafa Behzadfar 2
1 School of environment, College of Engineering, University of Tehran
2 School of Architecture and Urban Development, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

The study of the resilience of the cities against earthquake is one of the necessities for the reduction of losses and death toll of the earthquakes. Resilience has various definitions and there is not a unique comprehensive model for its quantitative assessment. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive quantitative indicator for resilience and to study the efficacy of social and governance strategies in improvement of urban resilience against earthquake. To achieve this aim, first effective dimensions and indices of resilience of urban areas were explored and extracted by reviewing available research studies and experts elicitation method. Then based on experts’ opinions and pairwise comparison the model was justified and the relative weights for dimensions and indices were obtained and a comprehensive overall resilience index was introduced. Using the proposed index, the efficacy of different social and governance strategies were compared considering three different earthquake scenarios of North-Tehran, Ray fault, and floating faults. The comparisons were based on three metrics i.e. absolute value of resilience increase, distance from the origin of the Pareto chart considering implementation duration time and costs, and the ratio of cost to resilience increase. In this regard, strategy S3 (90 percent increase of social resilience), strategy S1 (10 percent increase of social resilience) and strategy S3 were the optimal ones based on the first, second, and third metrics, respectively. On the whole, the social strategies had better efficiency than the governance ones, but it seems in practice the social and governance strategy categories must be implemented in an integrated manner which could be considered as a future research proposal.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Effectiveness
  • Social Dimension
  • Governance Dimension
  • Resiliency
  • Earthquake

مراجع

Behzadfar, M., Omidvar, B., Qalibaf, M. B., & Ghasemi, R. (2017). Develop index of urban resilience for earthquakes. Journal of Rescue and Relief (JORAR) 9(3): 80-86.
Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O'Rourke, T. D., A. M & von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake spectra, 19(4), 733-752.
Burton, Christopher G. (2012). The Development of Metrics for Community Resilience to Natural Disasters, PhD Thesis, College of Arts and Sciences, California State University.
Carlson, J. L., Haffenden, R. A., Bassett, G. W., Buehring, W. A., Collins III, M. J., Folga, S. M., ... & Whitfield, R. G. (2012). Resilience: Theory and Application (No. ANL/DIS-12-1). Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States).‏
Cutter, S. L., Barnes, L., Berry, M., Burton, C., Evans, E., Tate, E., & Webb, J. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global environmental change, 18(4), 598-606.
Darling, J. R. (1994). Crisis management in international business: keys to effective decision making. Leadership & Organization Development Journal; 15(8), 3-8.
Eshghei, A., & Gafari, A. (2020). Spatial analysis resilience City Earthquake Model Integration Case study: ten districts of the region one of Tehran. Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental hazards, 7(2), 81-102.
Godschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Natural hazards review, 4(3), 136-143.
Ghasemi, R., Omidvar, B., & Behzadfar, M. (2020). Study of the Effectiveness of "Technical-Physical" and "Socio-Economic" Strategies in Improving Urban Resilience against Earthquakes. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR), 8(1), 99-114.
Hermann, C. F. (1972). Some issues in the study of international crisis. International Crises: Insights from Behavioral Research, The Free Press, New York; 3-17.
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecology and systematics, 4(1), 1-23.
IFRC (2004). World Disasters Report. Ed. Walter L., Geneva, IFRC
JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) (2000). The Study on Seismic Microzoning of the Greater Tehran Area in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Pacific Consultants International Report. Japan: OYO Cooperation.
Kraas, F (2008). Megacities as Global Risk Areas. Urban Ecology 2008, V, 583-596
McEntire, D. A., Fuller, C., Johnston, C. W., & Weber, R. (2002). A comparison of disaster paradigms: The search for a holistic policy guide. Public administration review, 62(3), 267-281.
McManus, S., Seville, E., Brunsden, D., & Vargo, J. (2007). Resilience management: a framework for assessing and improving the resilience of organizations.‏
Norris, F. H., Stevens, S. P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K. F., & Pfefferbaum, R. L. (2008). Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American journal of community psychology, 41(1-2), 127-150.
Orencio, P. M., & Fujii, M. (2013). A localized disaster-resilience index to assess coastal communities based on an analytic hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 3, 62-75.‏
Pelling, M. (2003). The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan.
Roege, P. E., Collier, Z. A., Mancillas, J., McDonagh, J. A., & Linkov, I. (2014). Metrics for energy resilience. Energy Policy, 72, 249-256.‏
Smith, K. and Petley, D.N. (2008). Environmental hazards. Assessing risk and reducing disaster. Taylor & Francis, London.
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction) (2005). Hyogo Framework for 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. http://www.unisdr.org/wcdr/intergover/official-doc/L-docs/ Hyogo framework for-action-english.pdf. Accessed on 22 June 2005.
UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction) (2009). UNISDR Terminology for Disaster Risk Reduction. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR) Geneva, Switzerland.
Van Westen, C. J. (2013). Remote sensing and GIS for natural hazards assessment and disaster risk management. Treatise on geomorphology, 3, 259-298.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار
دوره 9، شماره 4
1400
صفحه 37-46

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار