نقش واسطه‌ای مصرف‌گرایی در ارتباط بین مادیگرایی و ردپای اکولوژیک (مورد مطالعه: شهروندان ارومیه)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه تبریز

2 دانشگاه آزاد واحد ارومیه

چکیده

تغییرات در سبک زندگی و الگوی مصرف تأثیرات بسیار زیادی بر محیط زیست داشته است، به­طوری­که این تغییرات، باعث افزایش ردپای اکولوژیک (تأثیر انسان بر محیط زیست) و کاهش ظرفیت زیست محیطی شده است. در کنار عوامل دیگر، دو عامل اجتماعی مؤثر بر میزان ردپای اکولوژیک و فاصله گرفتن انسان­ها و جوامع از پایداری زیست محیطی، مادیگرایی و مصرف­گرایی می­توانند قلمداد شوند. مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی روابط بین مادیگرایی، مصرف­گرایی و ردپای اکولوژیک انجام یافته است. جامعه­ آماری پژوهش حاضر شهروندان ارومیه و نمونه­ آماری آن 516 نفر از شهروندان 65-15 سال می­باشد که با به­کارگیری روش پیمایش و استفاده از نمونه­گیری خوشه­ای، مورد بررسی قرار گرفته­اند. نتایج به دست آمده نشان می­دهد متغیرهای مادیگرایی، مصرف­گرایی و پایگاه اقتصادی- اجتماعی، اثر مثبت و معنی­داری بر میزان ردپای اکولوژیک مصرف در بین شهروندان شهر ارومیه جنسیت، اثر کاهشی و معنی­داری بر آن داشته است. همچنین، نتایج تحلیل­های چند متغیره نشان داد که متغیرهای مذکور همراه با متغیر جنسیت پاسخگویان در مجموع 25/0 از تغییرات متغیر وابسته را مورد تبیین قرار می­دهند. 

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Mediating Role of Consumerism on the Relationship between materialism and ecological footprint (The case of urmia citizens)

نویسندگان [English]

  • T. Aghyari, hir 1
  • H. Honarvar 2
  • M.B. Alizadeh Aghdam 1
1 Social Science Department, Tabriz University
2 Azad University of Urmia
چکیده [English]

Changing in life style and consumption patterns has significant effect on environment, so that these changes increased ecological footprint (human effect on environment) and decreased ecological capacity. Along with other factors, two social factors viewed as effective factors on ecological footprint and made human and societies depart from environment sustainability, materialism and consumerism. The present study has been done with the aim of investigating the relationship among materialism, consumerism and ecological footprint. The population study is Urmia citizens and its statistic sample is 516 subjects in 15-64 ages that have been studied by use of survey method and cluster sampling. The achieved results show that variables such as materialism, consumerism and socio-economic status have had a positive and meaningful effect with less and meaningful effect of gender on rate of consumption’s ecological footprint among Urmia citizens. Also, the results of multivariable analysis showed that mentioned variables with variable of respondent’s gender generally explains 0.25 of changes of dependent variable. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ecological Footprint
  • Materialism
  • Consumerism
Abd’Razack, T A. & Ahmad Nazri Bin Muhammad Ludin, N. & Umaru, E T. (2013). “Ecological Footprint, Lifestyle and Consumption Pattern in Nigeria”. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci, 13 (4), 425-432.##Alikhah, F. (2007). “Political Impact of Consumerism”. Iranian Journal of Cultural Research, 1, 231-256. [In Persian]##Babin, B J. (1994). “Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value”. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4),  644-656.##Bakirtas, H. & Bulush, G C. & Bakirtas, I. (2014). The Effects of Materialism and Consumer “Ethics on Ecological Behavior: An Empirical Study”. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(4), 125-134 .##Bani fatemeh, H. & Hossein Nezhad. F. (2012). “Consumerism in society and its effect on urban environment: New approach”. journal of social-culture strategy, 1(2), 39-61. [In Persian]##Baudrillard, j. (2015). “Consumerism socity”. translate by Piroz Izadi, Sales press. [In Persian]##Birou, A. (1996). “Vocabulaire Pratique des Sciences Sociales”. Translated by Bagher Saroukhani, Keyhan press. [In Persian]##Cahill, M. (2002). “The Environment and Social Policy”. London and New York: Routledge.##Campbell, C. (1983). “Romanticism and The Consumer Ethic: Intimations of a Weber-Style Thesis”. Sociological Analysis, 44(4), 279-295.##Eastman, J K. & Goldmith, R E. & Flynn, L. R. (1999). “Status Consumption Consumer Behavior: Scale Development and Validation”. Journal of Marketing, 7(3), 41-51.## Habibi, K. & Rahimi, A. & Abdi, M H. (2012). “Ecological Footprint Assessment of Urban Transportation; New Approach for Sustainability of Urban Transportation Planning”. journal of geographical logistic of space, 2(5), 99-116. [In Persian]##Hjiloo, F. (2013). “Sociological explanation  of ecological footprint and effective factors on it (case study: Tabriz city)”. thesis of Ph.D, Faculty of Literature and human sience, Isfahan University. [In Persian]##Kilbourne, w. & Pickett, G. (2008). “How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior”. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 885–893.##Mick, D G. (1996). “Are Studies of Dark Side Variables Confounded by Socially Desirable Responding? The Case of Materialism”. Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (2), 106-119.##Milner, A. & Browitt, J. (2006). “Contemporary Cultural Theory: an Introduction”. Translated by Jamal Mohammadi, Gognous press. [In Persian]##Moffat, I. (2000). “Ecological Footprints and Sustainable Development”. Ecological Economics, 32, 359-362.##Mohaghegh, S. (2014). “Iranians twenty million tons of waste are produced annually”. http://sharghdaily.ir/News/32392. [In Persian]##Obach, b k. (2004). “New labor: slowing the treadmill of production?”. organization and environment, 17(3), 337-354.##Oakes, J M. & Rossi, P H. (2003). “The measurement of SES in health research: current practice and steps toward a new approach”. Soc Sci Med, 56(4), 769-784.##Porritt, J. (1984). “Seeing green: the politics of ecology explained”. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.##Rasmussen, T A. (2013). “Experience and Sustainable Consumption”. Paper presented at Nordmedia, Oslo, Norway.##Rees, W. & Wackernagel, M. (1996). “Urban Ecological Footprints: Why Cities Cannot be Sustainable and Why They are a Key to Sustainability?”. In Environmental Impact Assess Review, 16, 223-248.##Richins, M L. (2004). “The Material Values Scale: Measurement Properties and Development of a Short Form”. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(1), 209-219.## Sutton,  P W. (2013).”The environment: A Sociological Intoduction”. Translated by Sadeg Salehi, Tehran. Samt press. [In Persian]##Teimouri, I. & Salarvandian, F. & Ziarii, K. (2014).  “The Ecological Footprint of Carbon Dioxide for Fossil Fuels in the Shiraz”. Geographical Research, 1. 193-204. [In Persian]##Wackernagel, M. (1996). “Ecological Footprint and Approprited Carrying Capacity: a Tool for Planning Toward Sustainability”. Thesis of Doctor of Philosophy. The University of British Colombia.##Wackernagel, M. & Yount, J D. (1998). “The ecological footprint: an indicator of progress toward regional sustainability”. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51, 511–529.##Wackernagel, M. & Onisto, L. & Bello, p. & Linares, A C. & Falfa´n, I S L. &  Garcı´a, J M. & Guerrero, A I S. & Guerrero, M G S. (1999). “National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept”. Ecological Economics, 29, 375-390.##Wackernagel, M. & Onisto, L. & Callejas, L. & Alejandro, L F. & Me´ndez Garcı´a, J. & Sua´rez Guerrero, A I. & Guadalupe Sua´rez Guerrero, M a. (1997). “Ecological Footprints of Nations: How Much Nature Do They Use? How Much Nature Do they Have?”. Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio_5 Forum. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, Toronto.##