فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار

با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن جغرافیا و برنامه‌ریزی روستایی ایران

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

فهرست داوران

راهنمای داوران

واکاوی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های تربیت محیط‌زیستی در سند تحول بنیادین آموزش ‌و پرورش و اعتباربخشی آن

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه تعلیم و تربیت اسلامی ، پژوهشگاه مطالعات آموزش و پرورش

چکیده

هدف از این مطالعه واکاوی تربیت محیط‌زیستی در سند تحول بنیادین آموزش‌ و پرورش و اعتبار یابی آن از نگاه متخصصان است. روش پژوهش بخش اول، کیفی از نوع تحلیل محتوای استقرایی است. جامعه تحلیلی، سند تحول بنیادین آموزش‌ و پرورش و مبانی نظری سند تحول بنیادین آموزش‌ و پرورش است که به‌طور هدفمند، بر اساس اهداف پژوهش گزاره‌های ناظر بر ارتباط تربیت محیط‌زیستی استخراج، دسته‌بندی، کدگذاری و با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون مورد تجزیه‌وتحلیل قرار گرفت. روش پژوهش در بخش دوم روش دلفی است. جامعه موردمطالعه این بخش، اعضاء هیات علمی دانشگاه‌های علوم تربیتی بودند که نهایتاً ده نفر به‌طور هدفمند با توجه به آثارشان در دو حوزه تربیت محیط‌زیستی و سند تحول بنیادین و علاقه‌مندی‌شان به شرکت در مطالعه انتخاب شدند. بر اساس یافته‌های حاصل از تحلیل مضمون، تربیت محیط‌زیستی در سند تحول بنیادین آموزش‌ و پرورش از دو زاویه نظری و عملی موردتوجه قرارگرفته است. در حوزه نظری مضمون فراگیر احصاء شده، احیاء معرفت‌شناختی متافیزیک محیط‌زیستی است که با سه مضمون پیش سازمان دهنده توحید محوری (با 9 مضمون پایه)، معاد محوری با (با 3 مضمون پایه) و انسان‌محوری (با 5 مضمون پایه) موردتوجه قرارگرفته است. در حوزه عملی مضمون فراگیر احصاء شده، شایستگی‌های محیط‌زیستی است که با سه مضمون پیش سازمان دهنده بعد شناختی (با 6 مضمون پایه)، عاطفی (با سه مضمون پایه) و رفتاری (با 13 مضمون پایه) موردتوجه قرار گرفت. تحلیل داده‌های حاصل از قضاوت متخصصان حاکی از این است که متخصصان مضامین احصاء شده در دو بعد نظری و عملی را مورد تأیید قرار دادند. در بخش نظری بیشترین توافق متخصصان بر روی مضامین بعد انسان‌محوری و در بخش عملی بیشترین توافق متخصصان بر روی مضامین بعد شناختی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of Dimensions and Components of Environmental Education in the Document of Fundamental Transformation of Education and Its Validation

نویسنده [English]

  • Masoumeh Samadi

islamic education group , academy of educational

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study is to analyze environmental education in the document of fundamental transformation of education and its validation from the perspective of experts. The research method of the first part is qualitative inductive content analysis. The analytical community was document of fundamental change in education and theoretical foundations document of fundamental change.The research method in the second part is the Delphi method. The study population of this section was the faculty members of the universities of educational sciences. Finally ten people were purposefully selected according to their works in the two fields of environmental education and the document of fundamental change and their interest in participating in the study.Based on the findings of thematic analysis, environmental education in the document of fundamental change in education has been considered from both theoretical and practical. In the theoretical field, the universal theme identified is the epistemological revival of environmental metaphysics with three pre-organizing themes central monotheism (with 9 basic themes), central resurrection with (with 3 basic themes) and human-centered (with 5 basic themes). In the practical field, the enumerated thematic theme is environmental competencies that have been considered with three themes: pre-organizing cognitive dimension (with 6 basic themes), emotional (with three basic themes) and behavioral (with 13 basic themes). The analysis of the data obtained from the judgment of the experts indicates that the experts confirmed the enumerated themes in both theoretical and practical dimensions. However, in the theoretical part, the most agreement of experts is on the themes of human-centered dimension and in the practical part, the most agreement is on the themes of cognitive dimension.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Environmental Education
  • Dimensions
  • Components
  • Educational Transformation Documents
  • Accreditation
مراجع
Aliabadi, k, Joneidijafari, F., & Poorroostaei Ardekani, S. (2021). “The effect of augmented Reality – based Environment Literracy education program on the environment knowledge, attitude and behavior of high school student”. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 9(2), 9-22. [In Persian]
Amy, K., Shari, M.,Tina, G., Craig, B. & Chirs, D. (2016). “Atom Tracker: designing a mobile augmented reality experiences to support instruction about cycles and conservation of matter in outdoor learning environment”. Association for Educational Communications & Technology, Indiana university Bloomington, 7(2), 111-113.
Azadkhani, P.,Saadatnejhad, M., & Sharafkhani,J. (2018).“The Evaluation of Eenvironmental Education and Environmental Protection Practices of Female High School Students in Islam”.Human & Environment, 18(1),139-153. [In Persian]
Crawford, E., Luke, O., & Van Pelt, W. (2015).“Children as Solutionaries: Environmental Education as an Opportunity to take action”. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 3(1). 54.
Dashtaki, N., Majedi, H. & Habib, F. (2020). “Extended abstract Explanationn citizens Environment Ethics in the of the environment: Providing a conceptual Model”.Journal Reserch and Urbann Planning, 12(44), 157-172. [In Persian]
Davoodi, M. & Vojdany, F. (2017). “Foundations and Objectives of Environmental Education in the works of Ayatollah Javadi”.Revelatory Ethics, 7(1),5-29. [In Persian]
Fogg, M. J. (2000). “The Ethical Dimensions of Space Settlement. Space Policy, 16, 205-211.
Ghaffari,H. & Younesi, A. & Rafiee, M. (2015). “Analyzing the Role of Investment in Education to Achieve Sustainable Development; with special emphasis on environmental education”. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 79-100. [In Persian]
Hollweg, K. S. (2011). “Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy”. Washington: North Ameriaca Association for Environmental Education.
Hoseini, S, A & Ranaie, A. (2019). “An Analysis of the Roots of the Inability of Conventional Environmental Economics Theories in Explaining and Solving Environmental Crises and Its Implications for the Economics of the Islamic Environment”. Marifat-e Eghtesad-e Islami Journal System, 10(20), 197-213. [In Persian]
Imani Naini, M.,  Talaee, E & Sa’dipour, M. (2017). “Explaining Environmental Education Based on the Philosophical Foundations of Education in the Islamic Republic of Iran”. Journal of Applied Issues in Islamic Education, 2(4), 7-46. [In Persian]
Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S. & Fuhrer, U. (1999). “Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour”. Journal of environmental psychology, 19(1), 1-19.
Keramati, E. & Ahmadabadi, Z. (2019). “Content analysis of Sciences Textbooks in first stage of high school from the perspective of Environmental education”. Curriculun Research, 8(1), 200-226. [In Persian]
Khamoshibidgoli, S., & Mazaheri, H. (2020).“The Environmental Indicators in the Content of Elementary School Textbooks”. Journal of Curriculum Studies (J. C. S), 14(55), 177-200. [In Persian]
Mahmoodi,S. (2018). “Content Analysis of Heavenly Gifts Elementary Textbooks in Term of Concerns about Environmental Ethics”. Journal of Applied Issues in Islamic Education, 3(3),131-162. [In Persian]
Masoomifard, M. (2019). “Study of the Relationship of the various Interaction Types in E-learning with Collaborative Learning Quality (Case Study of Master's Students in Environmental Education)”. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 7(3), 103-114. [In Persian]
Ojomo., P. (2011). “Environmental ethics, African”. Journal of Environmental Sciences & Technology, 8(5), 572-578.
Saka, M., & Surmel, H. (2013).  “Development of a scale for environmental ethics approaches. A study of validity and reliability”. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 14(3),1443-1452.
SalimianRizi, M., Amini, M. & Madani, S, A. (2018). “Assessment of Environmental Literacy of Students and operational challenges of Environmental Education in Secondary Education”. Curriculum Researches, 9(2), 288-313. [In Persian]
Shiranibidabadi, E., Larigani, M., & Farajollahi, M. (2013). “Influece of urnviornmental education on valuation & environmental behavior of secondary school students in isfahan province”. Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 4(2), 30-38. [In Persian]
Shobeiri,M., Ghaemi,A. & Ghaemi,P. (2013). “ investigation of the process of environmental education in the five-year development plans of the country and presenting appropriate solutions for implementation of environmental education”., Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, 1(4), 29-40. [In Persian]
Tabatabai, S. M. (1985). “Almizan, Mousavi Hamedani,S. M. B”. Qom: Scientific and Intellectual Foundation of Allameh Tabatabai. [In Persian]
The Theoretical Foundations of Fundamental Transformation. (2010). “Higher Education Council”. Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
The Document of a fundamental change of education, (2010). “Higher Education Council”.Tehran, Iran. [In Persian]
Theodorou, P., Kydonakis, P., Botzori, M. & skanavis,c. (2018). “Augmented reality proves to be a breakthrough in Environmental Education”. Protection and Restoration of the Environment XIV, 219- 228.
Tohidnia, F., Jalali, A., Vaez, R.,& S. Hossain. (2019). “The Revival of Sacred Essence of Nature, the Solution to Environmental Crisis (Review of the Philosophical View of Seyed Hossein Nasr)”. The Quarterly Journal of Philosophical Investigation, 27(2),95-116. [In Persian]
Uyar, Y. & Ensar, F. (2016). “Does Mother Tongue Education Support Development of Environmental Literacy in Turkey? An Analysis of Turkish Course Books”. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 11(1), 1-8.
Vafeghi, E. & Haghighian, M. (2015), “The role of culturall copital in environmental social behavior”. Parliament and Strategy, 84, 371-93.
White, L. (2005). “The Historical roots of our ecological crisis”. Malekian, M. Pojman, L. Environmental Ethics. (1). Tehran: Tosseh Publication. [In Persian].
Zolfaghari,M. (2019). “Investigating the Role of Formal Education in Changing Environmental Behaviors (Case Study: Optimal Water Use) ”. The Scientific Quarterly Journal of Research in Social Studies Education, 2(2), 127-145. [In Persian]
 
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار
دوره 10، شماره 3
اردیبهشت 1401
صفحه 29-41
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار