آسیب‌شناسی برنامه‌های پنجم و ششم توسعه در بخش آب

بنیاد, لیلا; زارع شاه آبادی, اکبر

doi:10.30473/ee.2023.65697.2570

آسیب‌شناسی برنامه‌های پنجم و ششم توسعه در بخش آب

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ دکتری توسعه اقتصادی- اجتماعی و پژوهشگر اتاق فکر آب و محیط‌زیست دانشگاه صنعتی شریف

² دانشیار، گروه علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران

10.30473/ee.2023.65697.2570

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل گفتمان اسناد بالادستی آب بازه زمانی(1394-1390)(1400-1396) بوده است، جامعه‌ی آماری آن شامل یازده سند از اسناد بالادستی آب است که در این بازه زمانی تدوین شده است. روش پژوهش حاضر تحلیل گفتمان به روش لاکلاو و موفه است و سعی شده به این سه سوال پاسخ داده شود گفتمان حاکم بر اسناد بالادستی آب چه بوده است؟ دالهای مرکزی، مولفه‌های گفتمانی، زنجیره هم ارزی و غیریت‌سازی حاکم که نشان دهنده این گفتمان بوده اند، چه بوده است؟ و از چه نظریه‌ای به منظور تبیین گفتمان حاکم بر این اسناد استفاده شده است؟ تحلیل این اسناد نشان داد که گفتمان اصلی حاکم بر این دوره گفتمان زیست‌محیطی است که دالّ اصلی و نقطه‌ی ثقل این اسناد به حساب می‌آید، که حاکی از اتخاذ رویکردی زیست‌محیطی بر منابع طبیعی دارد و این گفتمان با غیریتسازی گفتمان توسعه پایدار در این اسناد خود را نمایان می‌سازد و دالهای اصلی و شناوری مثل هژمونی گفتمانی کاهش مخاطرات طبیعی و توجه به محیط‌زیست، آموزش و ترویج توسعه کشاورزی و زیست‌محیطی ، توجه به تاثیرات زیست‌محیطی اقدامات، توجه به فناوری‌های نوین در کشاورزی، ضابطه‌مند کردن فعالیت‌های زیست‌محیطی و وجود تسهیلات اعطایی و سرمایه‌گذاری در بخش کشاورزی موید این گفتمان بوده است.که با دالهای هم ارزی مثل تشویق سرمایه گذاران به سرمایه‌گذاری در طرح‌ها ،توجه به فناوری‌های سازگار با اقلیم، توسعه حمل و نقل سبز مورد تایید قرار می‌گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

آموزش محیط زیست و برنامه ریزی توسعه

عنوان مقاله [English]

Pathology of the Fifth and Sixth Development Plans in the Water Sector

نویسندگان [English]

Leila Bonyad ¹
Akbar Zare shahabadi ²

¹ Ph.D. in Sociology-Economic Development and Researcher of the Water and Environment Think Tank of Sharif University of Technology

² Associate Professor, Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

چکیده [English]

The aim of the current research was to analyze the discourse of upstream water documents in the time period (2011-2015) (2017-2021). Its statistical population consists of eleven documents from upstream water resources that were compiled in this period of time. The method of the present study is the analysis of discourse by Laclau and Mouffe method and an attempt has been made to answer these three questions; What was the dominant discourse on the documents upstream of water? What have been the central signifiers, discourse components, a chain of equivalence, and the ruling otherness that represents this discourse? And what theory has been used to explain the discourse governing these documents? The analysis of these documents showed that the main discourse governing this period was environmental discourse, which is the main signifier and point of these documents and indicates the adoption of an environmental approach to natural resources. This discourse manifests itself in the othering the discourse of Sustainable development in these documents and the main and floating signifiers such as the discourse hegemony of reducing natural hazards and paying attention to the environment, education and promotion of agricultural and environmental development, attention to the environmental effects of actions, education and promotion of agricultural and environmental development, attention to the environmental effects of actions, attention to innovations in agriculture, regulating environmental activities, and granting and investing facilities in the agricultural sector has been a confirmation of this discourse, which is approved through equivalence signs such as encouraging investors to invest in projects, paying attention to climate-friendly technologies, developing green transportation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Pathology
Fifth and Sixth Development Programs
Water

مراجع

Amiri, A. Shaneche, M. Golshani, A. (2020). “The effect of public policy process on water crisis in the Islamic Republic of Iran”. Iranian Political Science Association,15(4), 45-72. [In Persian].

Bonyad,L. (2022). “Sociological Study of Governance of Water Resources and Consumption in Yazd”, PhD thesis, Yazd University. [In Persian].

Deason, J.P. Schad, T.M. & Sherk, G.W. (2001). “Water policy in the United States: a perspective”. Water Policy, 3, 175-192.

Fuzzi, Y. Narimam, S. (2012). “Fundamentals of Political Thought of the Society of Teachers of the Seminary of Qom in the First Decade of the Revolution”. Journal of Contemporary Political Articles, 3 (3), 114-91. [In Persian].

Gholami Shekarsarai, M.R. (2015). “Discourse Analysis of Ethnic Policies after the Islamic Revolution (with emphasis on the period 1376-1368)”. Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies in Public Policy, 6 (20), 124-111. [In Persian].

Greve, P. Gudmundsson, L. & Seneviratne, S.I. (2018). “Regional scaling of annual mean precipitation and water availability with global temperature change”. Earth Syst Dynam, 9, 227–240.

Haghighat, S.S. (2019). Political Science Methodology, Mofid University Press: Qom. [In Persian].

Holley, C. Gunningham, N. & Shearing, C. (2012). The New Environmental Governance. Publish Earthscan, London.

Kalantari, P. Abbaszadeh, M. Saadati, M. PourMohammad, R. & Mohammadpour. N. (2009).”Discourse Analysis: Emphasizing critical discourse as a method of qualitative research”, Sociological Quarterly, 1 (4), 7-28. [In Persian].

Malki, M. Salehi, S. Karimi, L. Shobeiri, S.M. (2020). “Discourse Analysis of Equitable Water Distribution Law in Iran”, Journal of Water and Sustainable Development. 9(1), 74-61.

Mandal, A. Dhaliwal,S.S. Mani, P.K. Toor, A.S. (2021). Conservation agricultural practices under organic farming, Chapter 2 - By book: Advances in Organic Farming Agronomic Soil Management Practices.

Nikdarasel, M.H. Fathifath, Z.A. (2016). “Analysis of the discourse of the Islamic Revolution of Iran using the concept of radical pluralist democracy of Laclau and Mouffe”.Quarterly Journal of the Islamic Revolution Approach, 35, 140-123. [In Persian].

Nourisani A, Mohseni RA, Kusheshi M, (2020). “Socio-cultural Impacts and Consequences of Two Methods of Managing the Release of Reservoirs: A Case Study of Kucheri and Azad Dam or Reservoirs”. Journal Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 10(36), 206-235.

Okereke, C. Bulkeley, H. Schroeder, H. (2009).”Conceptualizing climate change governance beyond the international regime”.Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 1-61.

Ostrom, E. (2010). “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems”. American Economi Rewiew, 100(3), 641-72.

Pirestani MR, & Shafghati M. (2009). “Investigation of Dams on Environmental Impact”. Quarterly New Approaches in Human Geography (Human Geography), 1(3), 39-50.

Tajik, M.R. & Roozkhosh, M. (2007). “A Study of the Ninth Iranian Presidential Election from the Perspective of Discourse Analysis”.Bi-Quarterly Journal of Social Issues in Iran. 5 (61), 127-83. [In Persian].

Talebi, M. Zareian, A. Farkokhniya, A. Roozbahani, R. (2022). “Investigating the evolution of water planning and policy in pre- and post- Islamic Revolution in Iran”. Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 14(53), 151-178. [In Persian].

Van der Heijden, J. (2013).”Towards a Better Understanding of Building Regulation”, Environment and Planning, 36(6), 1038-1052.

Zolfaghari, A. SabardMirchi, H. Bagheri Benjar, A.A. (2017). “Representation of Civil Society in the Press (Analysis of Civil Society Discourse in the Iranian Press in the Period (2009-2014)”. Sociology of Social Institutions, 4 (9), 77-43. [In Persian].